Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Prostate sparing cystectomy versus nerve sparing radical cystectomy in treatment of invasive bladder cancer:
المؤلف
Zaza, Mohamed Mahmoud Abdelfatah.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / محمد محمود عبد الفتاح ظاظا
مشرف / عمـــرو فكرى الشوربجــــى
مشرف / طــارق عثمــان الســيد
مشرف / محمد وائل صفــا
الموضوع
Urology.
تاريخ النشر
2013.
عدد الصفحات
209 p.:
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
جراحة المسالك البولية
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2013
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - Urology
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 32

from 32

Abstract

Nerve sparing cystectomy was described in the early eighties to improve functional results and potency, in early nineties prostate sparing cystectomy was described to improve both continence and potency without jeopardizing the main aim of ontological surgery, which is adequate Cafcmological control.
Our series, included 40 patients who randomized into two groups 20 patients in group (1) prostate sparing cystectomy and 20 patients in group (2) nerve sparing cystectomy in Ain shams university hospital, Cairo, Egypt with a mean follow up of 26 months. Our objective was to assess the functional results of the two procedures together with specific complications and/or oncological risks as controlled randomized prospective study.
Mean operative time together with perioperative blood loss and need for transfusion was no significant differance between PSC group and NSC group, however these parameters were comparable to the standard radical cystectomy with orthotopic urinary diversion series.
Early post operative complications were studied in only three series other than our’s. In our series, early complications were comparable to that of the standard radical cystectomy series.