الفهرس 
REVIEW OF LITERATUREOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 159 |  |  |
| | | from | 159 | | |
Abstract
Fifty samples of each air, drinking water, feed and litter were collected from ·. five poultry
farms located at Alexandria · Province and examined bacteriologically and mycologically to evaluate
their sanitary quality.
A. BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF EXAMINED SAMPLES:
1. The bacteriological examination of the air samples revealed the isolation of different species
of pathogenic and potentially pathogenic bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus (4.55% ),
Staphylococcus epidermidis (3.03 %), Streptococcusfaecalis (10.61 %) , Salmonella spp. (4.55%), E.
coli (21.21 %), Arizona spp. (3.03%), Klebsiella· spp. (13.64 %), Proteus rettergi (1.52 %),
Proteus mirabilis (1.52 %), Pseudomonas spp. (4.55%), Serratia spp. (4.55 %), Shigella flexneri
(l.52%), Provedancia spp. (3.03 %), Citrobacter spp. (6.06%), Acromobacter spp. (7.58 %),
Alcaligenes faecalis (4.55%), Alkalescens dispar (4.55%) and Edwardsiella spp. (1.52 %).
2. The bacteriological examination of the drinking water samples revealed the isolation
?Sap_hylQ_coccus aureus (8.74 %), Staphylococcus epidermidis (5.46%), Streptococcus f aecalis
(l5.3%), Salmonella spp. (2.73 %), E. coli (10.93 %), Arizona spp. (0.55%), Klebsiella spp. (4.37
%), Proteus morganii (3.28 %), Proteus rettergi (2.73%), Proteus mirabilis (2.73%), Pseudomonas
spp. (13.66 %), Serratia spp. (1.09%), Shigella flexneri (3.83%)
Provedancia spp. (2.19% ), Citrobacter spp. (3.83% ), Enterobacter spp.
(7.65 %), Acromobacter spp. (3.83 %), Alcaligenes faecalis (2.73 %) and
Alkalescens dispar (4.37%).
The bacteriological examination of the feed samples revealed the isolation of Staphylococcus aureus
(6.87%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (4.58 %), Streptococcusfaecalis (25.19% ), Salmonella spp.
(4.58%), E. coli (6.87 %), Arizona spp. (0.76%), Klebsiella spp. (2.29% ), Proteus vulgaris (3.81
%), Proteus morganii (1.53%), Proteus rettergi (4.58 %), Proteus mirabilis (0.76% ), Pseudomonas
spp. (9.92 %), Shigella flexneri (4.58 %), Provedancia spp. (3.05 %), Citrobacter spp. (2.29 %),
Enterobacter spp. (5.34 %), Acromobacter spp: (3.82 %), Flavobacter spp. (2.29%), Alkalescens
dispar (4.58 %) and Edwardsiella (2.29 %).
The bacteriological examination of litter samples revealed the isolation of Staphylococcus aureus
(8.05 %), Staphylococcus epidermidis (9.77%), Streptococcus faecalis (14.37% ), Salmonella
spp. (8.62%), E. coli · (13.79%), Arizona spp. (l.15 %), Klebsiella spp. (4.6%), Proteus
vulgaris (0.6 %), Proteus morganii (4.01 %),.Proteus rettergi (2.29%), Pseudomonas spp. (10.42
%), Serratia spp. (1.72% ), Shigella flexneri (2.87%), Provedancia spp. (1.72%),
Citrobacter spp. (4.01 %), Enterobacter spp. (1.72 %), Acromobacter spp. (5.75%), Flavobacter
spp. (0.6%) ,Alkalescens dispar (2.29%) and Edwardsiella (l.15 %).
B. MYCOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF EXAMINED SAMPLES:
1. The mycological examination of the air samples revealed the isolation of different species of
fungi including: Aspergillus niger (22.5 %), Aspergillus flavus (5 %), Aspergillus ochracus (2.5
%), Aspergillus terrus (0.83 %), Aspergillus nidulans (l.67 %), Aspergillus glucaus (0.83 %),
Aspergillus candidus (3.33%), Penicillium spp. (15 %), Fusarium spp. (3.33 %), Alternaria spp.
(2.5%), Curvolaria spp. (1.67 %), Cladosporium · spp. (2.5%), Scopulariopsis spp. (1.67 %),
Geotrichum spp. (2.5 %), Rhizopus spp. (2.5 %), Mucor spp. (10 %), Paecilomyces spp. (0.83%),
Dematocia spp. (0.83%), Basidiospores (0.83%), Sterile mycelia (0.83 %), Candida albicans (7.5 %),
Rhodotorulla rubra (1.67 %), Torulopsis versatilis (25%), Torulopsis collicuZOse (0.83 %) and
Unidentified fungi (5.83 %).
2. The mycological examination of the drinking water samples revealed the isolation of Aspergillus
niger (14.65 %), Aspergillus fumigatus (15.92 %), Aspergillus flavus (14.01 %), Aspergillus
ochracus (1.27 %), Aspergillus terrus (1.27 %), Aspergillus nidulans (0.64 %), Aspergillus glucaus
(1.91 %), Aspergillus candidus (1.27 %), Penicillium spp. (9.55%), Fusarium spp. (l.27 %),
Alternaria .spp. (1.27%), Curvolaria spp. (0.64 %), Cladosporium spp. (0.64 %), Scopulariopsis spp.
(0.64 %), Geotrichum spp. (1.27 %), Rhizopus spp. (0.64 %), Mucor spp. (12.10 %), Absidia spp.
(0.64 %), Paecilomyces spp. (0.64 %), Sepodenium spp. (l.27%), Dematocia spp. (1.27 %), Sterile
mycelia (0.64 %), Trichephton terrestre (0.64 %), Candida albicans (10.19 %), Rhodotorulla rubra (l.91 %) and Unidentified fungi (3.82 %).
3. The mycological examination of feed samples revealed the isolation of Aspergillus niger (9.79%),
Aspergillus fumigatus (19.58 %), Aspergillus flavus (18.88 %), Aspergillus ochracus (0.7 %),
Aspergillus terrus (0.7 %), Aspergillus nidulans (1.40%), Aspergillus glucaus (2.80%), Aspergillus
candidus (2.10%), Penicillium spp. (11.89% ), Fusarium spp. (2.10 %), Alternaria spp (2.80 %),
Curvolaria spp. (1.40 %), Cladosporium spp. (0.70 %), Scopulariopsis spp. (0.70 %), Geotrichum
spp. (0.70%), Rhizopus spp. (1.40 %), Mucor spp. (11.19%), Absidia spp. (2.10 %), Paecilomyces spp.
(1.40 %), Sepodenium spp. (0.70 %), Dematocia spp. (0.70 %), Sterile mycelia (1.40 %), Trichephton
terrestre (1.40 %) and Unidentified fungi (3.50 %).
4. The mycological examination of litter samples revealed the isolation of Aspergillus niger (9.09
%) Aspergillus fumigatus (13.64 %) Aspergillus flavus (9.09 %) Aspergillus ochracus (1.52 %)
Aspergillus terrus (2.27 %) Aspergillus nidulan.s (3.03 %) Aspergillus glucaus (0.76 %) Aspergillus
candidus (0.76 %) Aspergillus clavatus (0.76 %) Penicillium spp. (4.55 %) Fusarium spp. (3.79 %)
Alternaria spp. (3.03% ) Curvolaria spp. (1.52%) Cladosporium spp. (0.76%) Scopulariopsis spp.
(3.03 %) Geotrichum spp. (0.76 %) Trichoderma spp. (0.76%) Rhizopus spp. (0.76%) Mucor spp.
,