![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract This work carried out to light light the nutritional status of brain and bone cancers children 1-3 and 4-8 years old. The sample size was 60 patients C30 patients of each of brain & bone groups; including 15 patients of each of 1-3 and 4-8 y old children. Patients are visiting (out patients) the Children Cancer Hospital (57357) at Cairo, Egypt. They consumed the home food before surgery, while after surgery they consumed the hospital food menu. The patients were followed before as well as after the surgery. To assess the nutritional status of patients information were collected about the dermographic, anthropometric characteristics, and nutritional status score was also recorded .CBC and serum glucose estimated. Lipids profile of serum glucose analyzed (TC, TG, HDL, VLDL, LDL & AI). Liver function (serum ALT& AST activities) and Kidneys function (serum creatinine, urea & uric acid) were estimated. Intakes of energy, carbohydrates, protein, fat. vitamin (A,C&E) and selenium were assessed in comparison with the DRI as reference. Information incased both groups were taken before surgery (Home menu) as well as after month of the surgery (Hospital menu). The results arrived as ravened the following: (1) Before surgery mean age of brain cancer children was 2.8±0.98 and 7.5±1.025y for 1-3 & 4-8y groups respectively . mean weight and height were higher for 4-8 than 1-3y groups being 2.4± 2.54& 11.2±1.87kg and 1.08±0.94& 0.96±1.02m respectively which is expected based on age difference. Similarly mean BMI was higher for 4.8y than 1-3y groups which were 19.20±1.45&12.15±1.42kg/m2 respectively. Mean nutritional status score was also higher (97.39±9.87%) for 4- 8 than 1-3y. (2) Before surgery of brain cancer children (1-3&4.8y groups) mean value of weight for both groups fell in the Reference Range. This was found for BMI of 4-8y group. Nevertheless mean height for 1-3y group was more than the Reference Range, while that of 4-8y group less than the Reference Range, Also BMI of 1-3y group was less than the Reference Range. (3) After surgery with exception of age and height, all studied parameters improved showed variable increases; after surgery all values fell in the Reference Range including BMI and nutritional status score which were less than the ref Range before the surgery, with exception of BMI less determined for 1-3% groups being slightly (-2.74%) less than the low limit of Ref, while was evidently lower (-10%) than the low limit of Ref. (4) Due to brain cancer surgery. Still all values were higher for 4-8y than 1-3 group, being close to the higher Ref. Limit Nutritional status score was even slightly more (101.74±4.21%) than the upper limit of Ref. Also body fat% was higher for 4-8 than 1-3 y group. Improvements after surgery took place indicating better health, being due to the operation and possibly due also to the hospital food. After surgery all children were normal based on nutritional status score. (5) Before surgery bone cancer children 1-3y group showed less BMI and nutritional status score than the Ref; BMI was less than normal and nutritional status score indicated Grade-I. Mild Malnutrition .For 4-8yr group height only was less than Ref. while BMI indicated normal status and nutritional status score was even more than 100% of Ref. The body fat% was 65.78% higher for ٤-٨y than 1-3 y children. Anyhow the status of ٤-٨y was better than 1-3y group. (6) After surgery bone cancer children age and height showed no changes which is normal. At This stage all parameters fell in the Ref. Range for both group. Only BMI of 1-3y group was slightly less than the low limit (only 3-6% less). (7) Due to surgery and, month feeding on hospital food all tested parameters increased. Percent increases of weight, BMI, nutritional status score & body fat for 1-3y group were 15.74, 15.84, 15.74& 21.12%, while for ٤-٨y group were 1.78, 1.75, 1.78 &2.38% respectively indicating that the improvement of young was much greaser than the older children similar trends of change were previously found for brain cancer children where percent increases due to surgery for 1-3y group were better being 8.04, 8.07, 9.64 &9.04% and 4.46, 5.05, 4.47 and 6.83% respectively. (8) Before surgery based on Hb results brain cancer children 1-3y old (10.3±1.24y/dl) were already anemic, while children 4-8y old were (11.1±2.01g/dl) at threshold Ref- Range 11-14 g/dl. (9) WBCs determined before surgery for bone & brain cancer children 1-3y was slightly less than lowed limit of Ref Range, while that of 4-8y old was more. (10) Lymphoblasts of brain cancer children before surgery were less than the lower limit of Ref. Range, while that of 4.8% old patients was higher. (11) Before surgery, serum glucose of 1-3 & 4-8 brain cancer children was higher than the Ref Range (70.110mg/dl). Being 1.8±7.45& 101±5.65mg/dl respectively, provided that it was higher in the former than the latter case. (12) After surgery for brain cancer patients, Hb & WBC improved for 1-3y children being no longer less than Ref. Range (11-14g/d). After surgery 1-3y children became not anemic. On the contrary 4-8y children because anemic due to reduction of Hb from 11.1 to 10.4g/dl; also WBC (103ml)which was more than Ref. Range (4.5-10.5) before surgery become loss than Ref.(4.1) after surgery. Considering the serum glucose both brain cancer groups were sensitive to surgery indicating reductions. (13) Before surgery 4-8y bone cancer children were anemic (Hb 10.8±2.05 g/dl) while younger group (12.3±1.45 g/dl) were not. Meanwhile WBCs (103/ml) for 1-3& 4-8yr cancer bone groups, which were 5.2±0.14 and 7.3±0.47 103/ml respectively. The reverse recorded for lymphoblasts (2.3&3.1% respectively) which showed values less than the lower limit of Ref Range (6.9%) for both group. (14) Serum glucose for bone cancer 1-3 & 4.8y groups was fell in the Ref. Range provided that value was higher in the latter than the former groups; this was also recorded for lymphobtasts, meanwhile the reverse recorded for Hb& WBCs values which were higher for 1-3 than 4-8y groups before surgery. (15) Due to surgery for bone cancer children Hb & WBCs more or less decreased while lymphoblasts and serum glucose more or less increased. After surgery 4- 8y group was still anemic, while that of 1-3y children was not WBCs decreased in both group, but was still higher than the Ref Range. (16) Due to decrease of Hb by surgery, more care may be given to supply brain & bone cancer patients with iron. 17) By calculation of percent change it was shown that improvement due to surgery was less pronounced for 4-8 than 1-3y group as regards CBC parameters, as well as the biological parameters. But no conclusion could be done definitely about severity of either brain or bone cancer and about better improvement due to surgery. (18) Lipids profile assessment indicated for brain cancer children before surgery indicated higher TC, LDL &AI for 1-3 y group and less TG HDL& VLDL as compared to 4-8y patients. According AI followed the levels of TC& LDL, while reversely related to the HDL level. Before surgery values of lipids profile (TC, TG, VLDL, HDL& LDL)for both groups fell in the Ref. Range suggesting normal status, but AI was higher than the upper limit, indicating disturbance of lipids profile, specially for 1-3y group. (19) After the surgery. TC, TG, HDL& VLDL were higher for 4-8y than 1-3y group. TC which was less for 1-3y group before surgery, reversed its level after the surgery. AI was worst (higher) after surgery for 1-3y group which was also recorded before surgery due to higher LDL and less HDL (compared to 4-8y children). As before surgery, after the surgery TC, TG, HDL, LDL & VLDL fell in the Ref. Range suggesting normal status. AI also fell in the Ref Range indicating normal lipids profile; the reverse however recorded before surgery. (20) Percent changes of lipids profiles 1-3 & 4-8y brain cancer children due to surgery (% respectively) were: TC- 13.17, 8.88; TG 41.60; +20.91; HDL +35.95, 48.40; LDL- 32.92, -32.19; VLDL+ 41.60,+20.91; AI- 48.64, 52.52 Based on AI values the improvement due to surgery was much more for 4-8y than 1-3y group. (21) For bone cancer children values of lipids profile before surgery (TC, TG, VLDL, LDL as well as AI) were higher for 4-8y than 1-3y group, while the reverse was observed for HDL. This indicated that lipid profile status was worst for 4-8y group. TC, TG& VLDL values fell in the Ref. Range, LDL of 1-3y group fell also in the Ref. Range, while that of 4-8y group was more than the higher limit of Ref Range , AI of both as groups was higher than the upper limit of Ref. Range. 22) After surgery, bone cancer children 4-8 group resealed higher TC Level (HDL) was also higher). On the contrary 1-3y group recorded higher TG, VLDL & LDL levels. A.I was higher for the 1-3 children following the higher LDL & VLDL and the lower HDL in this group, All recorded values for lipid profile after surgery fell in the Ref Range for 1-3& 4-8y children. (23) After surgery for bone cancer children the AI was still higher than the upper limit of Ref. Range (1.78-2.13). Although pronounced, improvement took place, from 2.7±1.02, 3.96±1.12 to 2.49±0.98, 2.33±0.54 for 1-3& 4-8y groups respectively percent decrease of AI was more for 4-8 than 1-3 groups regardless of that 4-8y group absolute AI value was higher. (24) Alt activity of both 1-3& 4-8y brain cancer children fell in the Ref. Range, being less than values recorded for Alt activity. Nevertheless values were wear the upper limit of leaf – Range indicating risk of liver function discarder; values were slightly higher for 1-3y group. On the contrary, AST mean values were somewhat higher for 4-8y group and for both age groups activities were more than the upper limit of Ref. Range, indicating already disorder of liver function for this group of brain cancer patients. (25) Surgery for brain cancer children deteriorated the liver function as indicated by the increase of ALT& AST activities, which were evidently more than the upper limit of Ref. Range. As compared with before surgery, after surgery percent increases of activities for 1-3& 4-8y groups were: ALT + 73.82%, + 120.33% and for AST +109.48, 1.03% respectively. This calls for much care to avoid deterioration of liver function due to surgery for brain cancer children. (26) Before surgery of bone children Alt& AST activities were higher for 1-٣y than 4-8y patients. While ALT activity was more than the upper limit of Ref Range considering 1-3y groups it fell in the Ref Range for 4-8y children. Never the less for AST values were more than the upper limit of Ref Range, indicating that both groups were suffering of liver disorder. (27) After surgery carried out for bone cancer all values of ALT and ALT activities were more than the upper limit of Ref- Range regardless of age. As incase of brain cancer, surgery carried out for bone cancer patients, aggravated the liver function disorder, calling for much medical care in surgeries of both types of children cancer. (28) After surgery for bone cancer children, percent increases of both enzymes activities were higher for 4-8y in comparison with 1-3y group, which was recorded for Alt only in brain cancer patients. (29) Before surgery creatinine, urea and uric acid levels of brain cancer children were more for 4-8y compared to 1-3y group, but all values fell in the Ref. Range, indicating that renal function was acceptable for both groups , being relatively better for 1-3y children. (30) Due to surgery carried out to brain cancer children creatinine and urea increased, with the decline of uric acid, provided that all values still fell in Ref. Range indicating acceptable renal function. In this connection, after surgery creatinine and uric acid were higher for 4-8y children than 1-3y group which was also noticed before surgery while urea was less for 4-8y group after surgery; the reverse was found however, before surgery. (31) Before surgery, renal function may be considered not acceptable due to that uric acid for both the upper limit of Ref. Ranges. Nevertheless creatinine of both groups and urea of 4-8y group fell in the Ref. Range for bone cancer children. (32) Due to surgery for bone cancer children creatinine, urea and uric acid levels were raised. Uric acid level was raised due to surgery, being more to the upper limit of Ref. Range, calling for more medical care + avoid loss of renal function. (33) As indicated by percent changes due to surgery, some loss in renal function took place, provided that loss was less pronounced of 4-8y group incase of brain cancer, while it was more pronounced for 4-8y group in case of bone cancer. Percent changes for 1-3y & 4-8y group due to surgery brain cancer were creatinine +66.67%, 20.0%; urea + 124.33% + 30.65%, uric acid -32.76%, 53.85%; for bone cancer – creatinine + 33.33%, 40%; urea + 12.50%+ 161.14’ uric acid 0 , + 3.30% respectively. (34) Before surgery, brain cancer 1-3y & 4-8y children were inflicted with malnutrition. This due to deficiently (except for T. calories of 4-8y Ref.) in all determined nutrients (T.protein, T.fat, Vits. A,C,E and selenium). Highest intake was noticed for T.fat and less west for selenium. (35) Due to more age, body weight and height in case of 4-8y age group DRI Ref. was higher compared to 1-3y children. Moreover for 5 of total light determined nutrient actual intakes compared to DRI were higher for 4-8y than 1-3y group. (36) After surgery of brain cancer children all nutrient were raised in both groups. Nevertheless with exception of T. calories for 1-3 and 4-8 y group, and vit.E of 1-3 and 4.8y group, all nutrients were still less than DRI, calling for much care in feeding brain cancer children after care in feeding brain cancer children after surgery to avoid malnutrition and deficient in nutrients intakes. (37) For bone cancer children all nutrients intakes were raised indicated much great adequacy of hospital food, compared to food intake before surgery out of the hospital. After surgery all nutrients intakes as percent of DRI were raised, specially for T. calories which showed evidently higher percent intake than RDA after surgery. But all other percents of intake were mostly less than DRI after surgery the imbalanced food menu may not be the reason because of distinguishable nutritionists of the hospital dealing with such a dangerous disease and most probable is due to loss of appetite by patients, which was also more after surgery. (38) Percent improvement of food intakes calculation revealed it was mostly for 4-8y than 1-3y groups , and in case of bone than brain cancer. |