Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
A Comparative Study Between Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cases of Acute Calcular Cholecystitis/
المؤلف
Wahba,Fadi Hani
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / فادى هانى وهبه
مشرف / محمد قنديل عبد الفتاح
مشرف / محمد ابراهيم حسن
مشرف / أحمد عادل عين شوكة
تاريخ النشر
2017
عدد الصفحات
114.p:
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
جراحة
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2017
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - General Surgery
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 113

from 113

Abstract

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is one of the important causes of abdominal pain on presentation to the emergency department. Early diagnosis and treatment of AC has a positive effect on morbidity and mortality.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is an important approach for treating acute cholecystitis nowadays. Issued data indicated that approximately 917,000 and >50,000 LCs were annually performed to treat acute cholecystitis in the United States and England, respectively. Although LCs have been extensively performed to manage acute cholecystitis, the optimal timing of LC for this given condition is inconclusive.
Patients and methods: from December 2016 to July 2017 in Ain Shams University Hospitals, a prospective randomized study was conducted over 30 patients of acute cholecystitis: 15 of them underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours, and the other 15 after 6- 8 weeks. Operation time, intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications and duration of hospital stay were assessed and compared in the 2 groups.
Results: Although the operation time was longer in the group with early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but the overall complications along with the total hospital stay were less in this group of patients.
Conclusion: Early timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in relation to the onset of gall bladder inflammation may reduce the conversion rate and the total complication rate. So, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis has both medical and socioeconomic benefits and it is the preferred approach in comparison to delayed approach.