الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Technical advances in hardware, software and materials provide dentists with new and improved options for indirect restorative materials. CAD/CAM technologies offer more options to dentists and technicians for fabricating dental restorations. Lava™ Ultimate CAD/CAM Restoration is a “new to the world” CAD/CAM product utilizing 3M‟s revolutionary nanoceramic technology. Because of different compositions and manufacturing techniques, dental ceramics vary in their physical and mechanical properties. One important property is the strength of the materials, and specially the flexural strength, because of the brittle nature of ceramics. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the biaxial flexure strength of lava ultimate which is composed of resin nano ceramic to that of IPS e-max press and VitaVM7and also to compare surface roughness as well as color stability of the three restorative materials. The material used in this study was: Lava™ Ultimate CAD/CAM Restorative [Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC)], IPS e.max® Press (lithiumdiscilicate) and VITA VM7. Ninety disc specimens were prepared and divided according to the material used into three groups thirty disc each (n=30). Each group is subdivided into 3 sub-groups (n=10) for each test. Lava ultimate samples construction was performed by using DWX dental milling machines. Summary 76 For IPS E-Max Press samples construction; the cylindrical split copper mold was used to allow the fabrication of wax discs with the intended dimension (12 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness). For fabrication of VM7 ceramic discs; the specimens were made directly into the mold that can be sectioned and then assembled again, where the condensation of the VM7 powder and liquid were directly condensed into the specimen hole in the split copper mold after placement of vita akzent glaze as a separating medium. The biaxial flexure strength (BFS) test has been used for the determination of fracture characteristics of brittle materials. Ten discs from each group were tested using a universal testing machine. The BFS was calculated in accordance with equation: Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (LSM) was used to measure the surface roughness. Using VITA Easyshade compact the baseline colour measurements were measured before the immersion in staining solutions (tea). Initial color values were used as a baseline of color change evaluation. All measurements were made on white background in order to eliminate background light. Specimens were immersed in tea for a period of 4 weeks Specimens were washed thoroughly and dried then subjected to color measurement by CIE L*a*b*. The Color difference ΔE between the color coordinates was obtained through Hunter equation: Δ Eab*= [(ΔL*) 2+ (Δa*) 2+ (Δb*) 2]½ Summary 77 The mean value of biaxial flexure strength test of lava ultimate specimens was 197.05±19.62 MPa while that of E-max press specimens was 215.3±37.97 MPa and that of VM7 specimens was 44.5±11.83 MPa. On comparing the mean in the three groups the difference was statistically significant where the ANOVA test was 132.956 and the p-value was 0.0001. On applying the post hoc test between groups it was found that there was no significant difference between Lava Ultimate group and E-max press, while there was a highly significant increase in Lava Ultimate than VM7, also there was a significant increase in E-max press group than the VM7. The mean value of the surface roughness test of Lava Ultimate specimens was 0.899±0.289 um while that of E-max press specimens was 0.845±0.292 um and that of VM7 specimens was 2.826±0.867 um. On comparing the means in the three groups the difference were statistically significant where ANOVA test was 41.439 with p-value 0.000. On applying the post hoc test between groups it was found that there was no significant difference between Lava ultimate and E-max press, while there was a significant increase in SR in VM7 group more than Lava ultimate and E-max press groups. The mean values of the ΔE of Lava Ultimate specimens was 5.873±0.923 while that of E-max press specimens was 3.358±0.742 and that of VM7 specimens was 1.95±1.104. On comparing the means in the three groups the difference were statistically significant where ANOVA test was 45.082 with p-value 0.0001. Summary 78 On applying the post hoc test between groups it was found that there was a significant increase in ΔE in Lava Ultimate than E-max press. Also, there was a significant decrease in ΔE in VM7 group more than Lava Ultimate and E-max press groups. from our study we concluded that the biaxial flexure strength test of the IPS e max press and the Lava Ultimate showed significantly higher values than VM7. IPS Emax press showed higher values than Lava Ultimate but with no significant difference The surface roughness of both Lava Ultimate and Emax press was significantly lower values than VM7 group (i.e. VM7 is the roughest material). Lava Ultimate had the least color stability due to its composite matrix although it could be repolished every now and then. VM7 was the most color stable so it could be used as veneers although it is the weakest ceramic in the study |