الفهرس 
Statistical AnalysisOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 75 |  |  |
| | | from | 75 | | |
Abstract
There are 3 commonly used surgical approaches to the hip: the anterior, lateral [anterolateral (Hardinge) and direct lateral (Watson-Jones)].and posterior approaches. Each one is different from the other in anatomy, technical aspects, outcome and complications. However there is no current consensus regarding which approach is the most suitable.
We conducted this study to compare various clinical outcomes and complication rates across the 3 approaches which may influence surgeon choice in the future and to identify which approach is the best for THA
The electronic literature search revealed 12 studies. among 8 studies posterior approach, the comparator included 8 studies anterior approach & 8 studies lateral approach.
The outcomes of interest were VAS, HHS and postoperative total complications after THA. Methods of measure for these outcomes were used according to the original studies.
The lowest VAS pain and highest HHS after THA is the Anterior approach followed by the lateral approach. The best approach class that had the lowest complications was posterior followed by the lateral approach, and the anterior approach had the highest risk of having complications after THA. Therefore, the use of the posterior approach is safe for THA, whereas although the anterior approach had efficient postoperative outcomes, it should still be use with caution due to the high complication rates. This study suggests that the lateral approach should be recommended for THA.