Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Luteal phase support with estradiol in poor responders undergoing In Vitro Fertilization / Intra-cytoplasmic Sperm Injection using gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a double blind randomized controlled trial /
الناشر
Ain Shams University.
المؤلف
Mohamed,Sara Osama .
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / ســـــارة اسامـــة محمــد
مشرف / جاسر محمد عدلي البشري
مشرف / مصطفــي فــؤاد جمعــة
مشرف / رضــوى رشيــدي علــي
تاريخ النشر
2020
عدد الصفحات
134.p;
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
أمراض النساء والتوليد
تاريخ الإجازة
1/4/2020
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - Obstetrics and Gynecology
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 138

from 138

Abstract

The role of progesterone supplementation as a luteal phase support in IVF cycles is well established world-wide , but the effect of luteal phase estradiol supplementation on implantation is not clearly defined.
Our study was conducted at Ain Shams University maternity hospital and a private IVF center thorough the period between April 2018 and September 2019 to find out the role of estradiol with progesterone as a luteal phase support in poor responders undergoing IVF and ICSI using gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol regarding the clinical pregnancy rate.
Out of 185 women assessed for eligibility for participation in the study, 170 women were eligible to participate, and were randomized within 24 hours of ovum pick-up to receive one of two different modes of luteal support. Nine women in both groups had their cycles cancelled and another 11 women were lost during follow up leaving only 150 women who completed the study.
There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the women’s age (mean =37.2±1.7 years) in the study group while in the control one (mean =37.1±1.9 years).
All other participants’ characteristics, the type of infertility, ovarian stimulation outcomes and hormonal levels in the early follicular phase were comparable in both groups except for the number of picked up oocytes that was significantly different between both groups; (mean= 2.4, SD = 0.8) in the study group while in the control one (mean = 2.1 , SD = 0.8) , p value =0.041.
Pregnancy outcomes showed significant difference between both groups with 42.4% in the study group achieved chemical pregnancy versus 17.6% in the control group with a p-value<0.001. Regarding the clinical pregnancy rate, it was 36.5% in the study group vs. 15.3% in the control group with a p-value= 0.002, and the live birth rate was 30.6% vs. 11.8% with a p-value=0.003 in both study and control groups respectively.