الفهرس 
? Distal Tibial FracturesOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 82 |  |  |
| | | from | 82 | | |
Abstract
Background: The thin soft tissue and muscles envelope that surrounds the distal tibia makes treatment of these fractures difficult. These fractures are often referred to as “pilon” fractures or “plafond” fractures”. If the articular surface of the tibia is involved; in such cases an anatomic realignment of the involved articular fracture in conjunction with a stable fixation is crucial.
Objectives: The aim of this paper is to conduct a systematic review of literature about functional and radiological outcomes in patients with distal intra articular tibial fracture treated by external fixator with ligamentotaxis.
Materials and Methods: We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance to the recommendations of the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) statement. MOOSE is a reporting checklist for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers of Meta-analyses of interventional and observational studies. According to International committee of medical journal association (ICJME), reviewers must report their findings according to each of the items listed in those checklists
Results: Over all, five studies reported the time to union. The overall effect estimates showed that the time to union after Ilizarov external fixator was 12.83 weeks. Three studies reported the rate of union. The overall effect estimates showed that the rate of union after Ilizarov external fixator was 88.4%. Over all, eight studies reported the good-excellent AOFS score. The overall effect estimates showed that the rate of good-excellent AOFS score after Ilizarov external fixator was 69.4%. Nine studies reported the rate of malunion. The overall effect estimates showed that the rate of malunion after Ilizarov external fixator was 10.2%. Over all, seven studies reported the rate of delayed union. The overall effect estimates showed that the rate of delayed union after Ilizarov external fixator was 6.3%. All studies reported the rate of pin infection. The overall effect estimates showed that the rate of pin infection after Ilizarov external fixator was 33.7%. Ten studies reported the rate of major infection. The overall effect estimates showed that the rate of major infection after Ilizarov external fixator was 3.4.
Conclusion: External fixation and ligamentotaxis by either ilizarov or any external fixator is a good and easy method for fixation of distal intraarticulat tibial fracture with few serious complications. due to easy to apply it, less rate of infection, no risk of bleeding since no opening the fracture site, good aligment of the joint, no streaping of the periosteomy that lead to later on good and rapid healing of the fracture.