الفهرس 
PacemakersOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 148 |  |  |
| | | from | 148 | | |
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effects of trans-tricuspid placement of permanent pacemaker (PPM), on the right-sided heart function and tricuspid valve function.
Background: Over the last decade there has been a significant increase in the number of cardiac device implantation as permanent pacemakers (PPM) worldwide in patients with cardiac rhythm disorders. Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) due to the endocardial lead is a known complication of this procedure, however the incidence of new or worsening TR had not been well studied.
Patients and Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation in our cardiology department in Ain Shams University. Patients who had pacemaker implantation less than one year ago, had severe tricuspid regurgitation before implantation or had previous tricuspid valve repair were excluded. A total of one hundred patients with an echocardiographic study before and another echocardiographic study at least one year after device implantation were included in our study. TR severity was graded as (0 none/trace, 1 mild, 2 moderate, 3 severe).
Results: Of the 100 patients (Mean age: 53.10 ± 16.04, 50% of patients were males) 65 had DDD and 35 had VVI. Before implantation 25 patient had trace TR (grade 0) vs. 6 patients after, 75 patients had mild TR (grade 1) vs. 82 after, with no patient had moderate TR (grade 2) vs. 12 patients after. TR worsened by one grade in 25 patients, (16 patients from grade 0 to grade 1 and 9 patients from grade 1 to grade 2) and by 2 grades in 3 patients (from grade 0 to grade 2), P-value < 0.01. TR jet area size (Mean ± SD: 2.80 ± 0.77 before vs. 4.15 ± 1.29 after, P-value < 0.01). Also, 99 patients had normal RV size and one had dilated RV before implantation vs. 95 patient had normal RV and 5 had dilated RV (p-value= 0.097). RV size, LVEF (Mean ± SD: 56.41% ± 7.52 before vs. 55.77% ± 8.00 after), RV function by TASPE (Mean ± SD: 19.15 ± 1.00 before vs. 18.96 ± 0.96 after), RVSP (Mean ± SD: 29.48mmHg ± 5.54 before vs. 29.81 ± 5.09 after) and diastolic function by E/A ratio (Mean ± SD: 1.60 ± 0.39 before vs. 1.57 ± 0.38 after implantation) did not show significant change.
Conclusion: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is associated with worsening of tricuspid regurgitation. Echocardiography plays an important role in assessing and grading this condition. Further studies are needed in order to illustrate the effects of these finding on patients outcomes.