الفهرس 
المقدمةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 327 |  |  |
| | | from | 327 | | |
المستخلص
We divided this study into an introduction, in which we talked about the importance of the topic and the methodology used in the study, an introductory chapter on what the interrogation is, and two sections, Chapter One: on the guarantees established for the interrogation in the primary investigation phase, and it consists of two chapters, namely, the first chapter: the definition of the primary investigation and its guarantees, The second chapter: the rights of the defense during the interrogation, and the second chapter: the guarantees established for the interrogation at the trial stage, and it consists of two chapters, namely: the first chapter: the general rules governing the trial procedures, and the second chapter: the accused and his natural judge, and a conclusion, which included the most important findings and recommendations, from The most important of them: that interrogation is the discussion of the accused in detail of the evidence and suspicions against him, and his request to respond to it, either by denying it and proving its corruption, or by admitting it and the confession that this may entail. He does not consider conducting a search for the evidence of the accusation seeking to obtain confessions from the accused, or exploiting his statements as evidence against him in proof, but rather is also seen as one of the means of Defense, whereby the accused can, through this procedure, be informed of the accusations brought against him, and all the evidence and evidence in the case file, and gives him the opportunity to make the explanations that help him reveal his innocence, and therefore the interrogation procedure is a basic procedure for both the accusative authority and the accused together And one of the most important features of the interrogation is that it includes the detailed discussion of the accused and his confrontation with the evidence against him. The interrogation is not achieved by simply asking the accused about what is attributed to him or informing him of the results of the investigation if this does not include a detailed discussion in the evidence assigned to him and the interrogation is assumed in this way detailed discussion and accurate questions Through which the investigator can reveal the contradiction between the accused’s answers, in order to extract the correct answers from these answers, the corrupt is posed from them. Either interrogation includes the detailed discussion of the accused and his confrontation with the evidence against him. They are two elements without which interrogation cannot be achieved. On the other hand, questioning the accused is a permissible act in any of the roles of the criminal case, and it is performed by the judicial control officer while collecting evidence, and also by the member of the Public Prosecution during the investigation phase, and also by the court, either the interrogation is a procedure One of the investigation procedures is only carried out by the competent investigating authority, and it is not permissible for the court to initiate it unless the accused accepts it, and that investigation is necessary in the felonies in national legislation, due to their seriousness. Rather, the Criminal Procedure Law has been called the Criminal Investigation Law, after amending this name The law was attributed to the criminal law, the Criminal Investigation Law, and after this designation was modified, the law came to refer to a felony in order to release the most important part to all, and then investigation is mandatory in international crimes, if it has a legal and realistic basis, and despite the fact that the Basic Law did not adopt the triple division of crimes And it falls within the framework of felonies, and the accused is the opponent who is accused by moving the criminal case before him, and it is not sufficient that the person committed the crime until he is considered an accused, but the criminal case must be initiated before him until the He is entitled to this capacity, so there may be multiple perpetrators, but the Public Prosecution, within the limits of its discretionary authority, may initiate a lawsuit against one of them and not others, and in this case, this person alone is the one who is interested and not the other, and the criminal case is initiated by the Public Prosecution according to the origin, and in an exceptional capacity from the court in cases of confrontation In court crimes, or by a member of the judicial investigation in exceptional cases in which the law permits him to take some investigation procedures, or by the individual in the case of a criminal lawsuit filed by direct means.