Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
المسئولية الجنائية فى المؤسسات الاقتصادية فى القانون العراقى والمقارن /
المؤلف
إسماعيل، يونس حسن.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / يونس حسن إسماعيل
مشرف / أحمد لطفي السيد مرعي
مناقش / تامر محمد صالح
مناقش / حسن السيد علي حسن
الموضوع
المسئولية الجنائية. المؤسسات الاقتصادية. القانون المقارن.
تاريخ النشر
2022.
عدد الصفحات
مصدر الكتروني (228 صفحة).
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
قانون
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2022
مكان الإجازة
جامعة المنصورة - كلية الحقوق - قسم القانون الجنائي
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 228

from 228

المستخلص

The penal law occupied a prominent position with the emergence of the industrial revolution and the emergence of machines and the subsequent development in the various fields: commercial and industrial, and the establishment of urbanization in its widest form. As new types of crimes began to emerge, the legislature should have intervened to curb them and stop their continuation.In view of the effective role played by economic institutions in achieving economic development in our time, and the negative effects that they can have in public and private life, if they are not regulated and controlled, the legislator has tried his best to enact legal texts that are compatible with the nature of these institutions from one hand, and enable it to perform its role effectively on the other.With the expansion of the activity of economic institutions and their luring and operation of capital, and the extension of control and management from the scope of the individual to the group, it was necessary to find a way. To prevent these institutions from violating the laws, or endangering the lives and interests of citizens who trusted in them, on the pretext that they are not natural persons who bear criminal responsibility.Therefore, the various legal systems have recognized the existence of the legal person, deciding the reality of his existence and subjecting him to administrative control in some of them, or regulating his legal role in others; This means that these persons have a distinct administrative ability other than the natural persons they represent, and the law has imposed their presence mandatory for the establishment of the institution and its acquisition of legal personality. As a result of the activity they practice in the name of the institution, or by one of its means.