Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Efficacy of XP-endo finisher file versus passive ultrasonic irrigation in removing calcium hydroxide from root canals with different irrigating solutions :
الناشر
Mahmoud Talaat Mustafa Abdelkareem ,
المؤلف
Mahmoud Talaat Mustafa Abdelkareem
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Mahmoud Talaat Mustafa Abdelkareem
مشرف / Wafaa Ahmed Omar Segari
مشرف / Shaimaa Ismail Gawdat
مشرف / Shaimaa Ismail Gawdat
تاريخ النشر
2019
عدد الصفحات
63 P . :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
طب الأسنان
تاريخ الإجازة
01/01/2021
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - الفم والأسنان - Department of Endodontics
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 92

from 92

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the XP endo finisher file in the removal of Ca(OH)₂ from straight root canals of single rooted teeth in combination with either NaOCl or NaOCl plus citric acid compared with that of PUI. Material and methods: Fifty two human extracted single rooted teeth with single straight root canals were selected and prepared using ProTaper rotary instruments up to size F3 (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). Ca(OH)₂ (MetaPaste, Meta Biomed Co, Cheongju, Korea) intracanal medication was placed inside the root canals and sealed with temporary filling for 7 days. The samples were then randomly divided into two equal groups according to the technique of Ca(OH)₂ removal and each group was further subdivided into two equal subgroups according to the irrigation protocol as follows; XP/ NaOCl, XP/ NaOCl + citric acid, PUI/ NaOCl, XP/ NaOCl + citric acid acid. For the 4 subgroups, the time of XP and PUI activation was standardized to be two repeated one-minute activation cycles. The first cycle of activation was after using 5 ml of 5.25 % NaOCl in all subgroups and the other cycle was after using 5 ml of 5.25% of NaOCl in XP/ NaOCl and PUI/ NaOCl subgroups and after using 5 ml of 10% citric acid in XP/ NaOCl + citric acid and XP/ NaOCl + citric subgroups. After Ca(OH)2 removal, a final flush was performed using 5 ml of distilled water for all subgroups. Accordingly, the total volume of irrigation solution that used for each sample during removal procedure was standardized to be 15 ml