Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Remineralization potential of MI varnish (CPP-ACP and Fluoride) versus Fluoride varnish in controlling white spot lesions in maxillary primary incisors :
الناشر
Samaa Sayed Hanafy Ahmed ,
المؤلف
Samaa Sayed Hanafy Ahmed
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Samaa Sayed Hanafy Ahmed
مشرف / Nevine Gamil Waly
مشرف / Randa Youssef Abd Al Gawad
مشرف / Nevine Gamil Waly
تاريخ النشر
2021
عدد الصفحات
115 P . :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
تاريخ الإجازة
30/1/2021
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - الفم والأسنان - Dental Public Health
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 174

from 174

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the caries prevention and remineralization potential of varnish containing fluoride and CPP-ACP (MI Varnish), compared to sodium fluoride varnish with xylitol (Profluorid) on WSLs in primary maxillary anterior teeth. Methodology: Sixteen children with sixty-one active WSLs on primary maxillary anterior teeth were randomly selected. At baseline, the WSL was evaluated using ICDAS II and EDI index. Teeth were allocated to intervention group group I (GpI) MI Varnish [5% NaF with CPP-ACP], and group II (GpII) Profluorid, VOCO [5% NaF with xylitol]. First, oral hygiene instructions and diet counseling were given followed by application of fluoride varnishes in their respective groups. Reapplication of the varnishes were at 3, 6, and 9 months from the baseline. The same parameters were recorded at follow-up at 3, 6, 9, and 12-months intervals. Data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis Results: Overall, the active WSL changed to inactive over a period of 12 months in GpI was 96.7%, and 83.9% in GpII. There was a significant reduction in ICDAS score of WSL in GpI from (2.00±0.26) to (1.17±0.65) (p<0.001). Likewise, there was a reduction in ICDAS scores of WSL in GpII but not statistically significant from (2.00±0.26) to (1.87±0.76) (p = 0.433). There was a significant reduction in EDI score of WSL in GpI from (1.97±0.72) to (1.17±0.65) (p<0.001). Comparatively, GpII showed statistically significant reduction in the EDI scores from (2.45±1.21) to (1.74±1.46) (p<0.001)