Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Influence of thoracic manipulation on type one complex regional pain syndrome post upper limb trauma /
الناشر
Manal Mohamed Hassan Mohamed ,
المؤلف
Manal Mohamed Hassan Mohamed
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Manal Mohamed Hassan Mohamed
مشرف / Amir Mohamed Saleh
مشرف / Yasser Ramzy Lasheen
مشرف / Hesham Hamed Refae
تاريخ النشر
2021
عدد الصفحات
213 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
العلاج الطبيعي والرياضة والعلاج وإعادة التأهيل
تاريخ الإجازة
15/10/2021
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - علاج طبيعي - Basic science
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 260

from 260

Abstract

Background: Complex regional pain syndrome type I is a chronic condition; there is disturbances in the sympathetic, somatosensory and motor nervous system, resulting in severe pain and disability. Purpose: To investigate the effect of thoracic manipulation on pain, functional disability, edema, bone mineral density, and range of motion in patients with Complex regional pain syndrome type I post-upper limb trauma. Patients and Methods: Thirty patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I (10-18 weeks duration of illness) were randomly distributed into two equal groups (15 for each group), control group (A) and experimental group (B).The mean age of groups (A and B) was (52±6.7) and (51.2±6.6) years respectively. group (A) was treated by traditional treatment which consisted of Transcutaneous Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulation, desensitization, mirror therapy, massage, and exercises.group (B) was treated by traditional treatment as group (A) and thoracic spinal manipulation. Treatment was given 3 times per week, for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated before and after treatment for pain severity using vasual analogue scale, functional disability using Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnair, edema using tape measurement, bone mineral density using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, range of motion using universal goniometer and opposition using ruler measurement. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant improvement in all the measured variables except in edema for group (A) within groups. However, improvement between groups was statistically significant in function (P=0.001), edema (P=0.038), shoulder range of motions (flexion, abduction and rotations) (P=0.001) favor in group (B) but statistically non-significant in pain at rest (P=0.098) and with brush (P=0.39), bone mineral density (P=0.257) and range of motions of shoulder Extension, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints (P>0.05)