Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Effect of manipultaive physical therapy on nerve root functions in discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy patients /
الناشر
Mohamed Badr Mohamed Hassanein ,
المؤلف
Mohamed Badr Mohamed Hassanein
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Mohamed Badr Mohamed Hassanein
مشرف / Eman Samir Mohamed Fayez
مشرف / Khaled Ahmed Fawaz
مشرف / Mohamed Abdelhakeim Kasem
مناقش / Eman Samir Mohamed Fayez
تاريخ النشر
2020
عدد الصفحات
92 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
العلاج الطبيعي والرياضة والعلاج وإعادة التأهيل
تاريخ الإجازة
1/11/2020
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - علاج طبيعي - Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular Disorders and their Surgeries
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 116

from 116

Abstract

Background: Lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) is a common clinical problem that involves L5 and S1 nerve roots and often results in persistent disability. The use of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for patients with symptomatic lumbar disc disease has been suggested for the management of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Purpose: to investigate the effect of manipulative physical therapy on pain and nerve root function. Methods: Fourteen discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy patients from both sexes participated in this study. They randomly assigned into 2 equal groups. group A (Experimental): every patient received 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks consisted of 20 minute side posture positioning, rotatory mobilization and rotatory manipulation of lumbar spine, neurodynamic mobilization, and core stability. group B (control): received program as group A without neurodynamic mobilization. All patients assessed for back pain by Visual analogue scale (VAS), Disability by Oswestry disability index, and for soleus H-reflex amplitude (symptomatic, asymptomatic sides, and ratio between) by surface EMG unit, and fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity (MD) & Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (symptomatic & asymptomatic sides) by MRI. Results: There was significant improvement post treatment within both groups for all dependent variables in the symptomatic side except MD & ADC, but none in the asymptomatic side. Independent t-test revealed non-significant differences in any dependent variable (but ADC symptomatic post-score was more similar to asymptomatic pre-score in group A, than group B, that had a trend toward significance, P-value=0.1)