الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Background: Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men in over one-half of the countries of the world. Multi-parametric MRI is currently recognized as the best imaging method for assessment of cancer prostate. Aim of the Work: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI and bpMRI, according to PI-RADS V2.1 using the histopathological results as the standard of reference. Patients and Methods: 41 suspected prostate cancer patients were enrolled in our study based on elevated PSA levels or abnormal digital rectal examination, underwent prostate MRI. Images were interpreted first without DCE-MRI sequence then DCE-MRI was included, and scores were recorded, once for bpMRI and once for mpMRI. Results: ROC curve analysis revealed that the AUC for the bpMRI and mpMRI protocols in diagnosing cancer prostate were 0.953 and 0.950 respectively and the difference was not statistically significant (P-value=0.875). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated to reveal that when using PI-RADS score of ≥3 as a cut-off, bpMRI and mpMRI had exactly the same sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV (100, 62.5, 85% respectively). When increasing the cut-off point of PI-RADS score to ≥4, the sensitivity of bpMRI decreased from 100 to 80, specificity increased from 62.5 to 93.75 yet, accuracy remained the same (85.4%). Whereas the sensitivity of mpMRI remained 100, specificity increased from 62.5 to 68.75 and accuracy increased from 85.4% to 87.8%. Conclusion: bpMRI without DCE-MRI sequence did not lead to significant differences in diagnostic accuracy when using PI-RADS V2.1. |