Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Physician Communication to Enhance Patient Acupuncture Engagement in Family Medicine /
المؤلف
Taha, Dina Babakr Abdelghany
هيئة الاعداد
مشرف / دينا بابكر عبدالغنى طه
مشرف / ناهد امين الدهشان
مشرف / سمر فرج محمد
مشرف / سمر فرج محمد
الموضوع
Family Medicine and Community Health.
تاريخ النشر
2023
عدد الصفحات
96 P. ;
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
ممارسة طب الأسرة
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2023
مكان الإجازة
جامعة قناة السويس - كلية الطب - Family Medicine and Community Health
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 106

from 106

Abstract

The emerging three-phase process of communicating acupuncture described here provides an initial model for teaching communication in the context of medical acupuncture. Given the exploratory nature of this initial study and the rarity of acupuncture treatment integrated into family medical settings, this is a first step in building knowledge in this realm of practice. Future research is needed to better understand the experience of patients who do not report notable results of acupuncture and to extend this study into other family medicine settings.
Integrating complementary therapies (acupuncture) into conventional medicine has garnered recent support. Given the health benefits, low cost, and minimal risks, the military has advocated for acupuncture and begun training family medicine physicians. Little is known about the role of physician communication in patients’ acupuncture engagement (uptake and adherence) in conventional medicine settings. We interviewed physicians (N = 15) and patients (N = 17) to capture physician communication they perceived affected treatment engagement. Data for each group were thematically analyzed. Physicians and patients prioritized different communication approaches and associated strategies. Physicians identified four approaches that enhance treatment engagement:
(1) using shared decision-making (e.g., treatment options);
(2) not being pushy (e.g., in tone);
(3) carefully choosing language (e.g., Eastern versus Western terms); and
(4)explaining treatment outcomes (e.g., efficacy). Patients also prioritized explaining treatment outcomes but differently (e.g., timing clarity), with two additional approaches: