الفهرس 
مقدمةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 342 |  |  |
| | | from | 342 | | |
المستخلص
This study discusses the poetry of(Ipn Moneer EI Trabolsy>Who is one of poets, Sham in the period of cross W:1rs,He was bron
in 473 A. H. (Of The Hegira) and died in 548 A.H.
We find that. Saoud Abdel Gaber Collocted The poetry of ”
Ipn Moneer” in 19th century then Omar Abdel Salam Tadmery
recollected it again in 19th Contury and the latter, poems were
increased or completed, We depended on the latter for increasing
which its parts was better than the Former, although there are some
mistakes in it also.
In fact, I have chosen the poetry of ”Ipn Moneer” because I
didn’t find any study deals with this poet as independent. but most of
it discussed his poetry through the poets of his age or through tackled
one case such as. The poetry of struggle in cross wars wefind that,
there’s contrastive judgement in his poetry; some of them are
approved and the others are disapprovedfor his poetry. But we leave
these judgements and let the text to talk about itself Also there’s
another reason for choosing his poetry particularly that his poetry in
that period is similar to our time (Life). Wefind thai, the study of his
poetry can be a mean to evoke the enthusiasm (energy) (We don’t
impose it on the text but the text gives us that and we shouldn’t
refuse it).
This study hasbeen chosen the textual style which directs us to
the text, avoiding some studies which turns toward social and
political life for age and the life of the poet then classify his poetry in
repeated dead form and this makes us face toface and it grants us
and we grant it.
And we depended on dividing the research into construction on
conscious and successive reading for texts, We tried as much as
possible to deal with completed texts or nearly completed, we didn’t
resort to individual lines except when it has a meaning and its mention
in the text is unnecessary through the study of any phenomenon, and
we depended on analyzing the texts and avoiding paraphrasing it
because it loses its value.
I divided the research into 5 chapters .. The First is ” Modem
and old intertextuality. In this chapter I clarified that the old people
discuss This meaning (Conception) behind another conception is
thefts atthough this name is ugly but there are good views in it like El
Hatemy and Ipn Khaldon. Then I discussed the foreign expression its
birth and its spread and I put adejinition to dejine it. After that, we
settle an Arabic expression opposite to the intertextuality in western
criticism.
The second chapter is the (Study ofinterte.xtuality phenomena
in Ipn Moneer’s Poetry)
It consists of 5points
I. The intertextuality in koran and it has many axes .
1. The intertextuality with structure.
2. Using koranic organization.
3. The Koranic words.
4. Absorption.
5. The Koranic narration.
II. TI,e interte.xtuality with the preface of rem ailIS Homes and the
changes in it and what connects in it such as:
Calling the others and what in itfrom the phonetic effects etc.
III. Figures Of Speech:
The most important thing in it is the effect of using
intertextuality and the effect of the poetic heritage in calling the old
poetic images.
- ’l”t’l’ -
V. Tile Imertextuality with’ characters:
Whether it was religious, historic or literary and the ways of using
it and the effect of it on the significant meaningfor text.
** [Tile third chapter is (Structurlism of calling) in this chapter. I
differentiate between the literary and ordinary style and the
importance of significant energy for poetic text which gives its
essence then, I clarified the calling in the introduction and its
connection with the phenomenon of speech in the preface of the
poem. The connection of calling with focusing on specific
(Particular) features in the poem of praise then I tackled. The
connection of calling with many significances.
** [Tile Fourtb chapter is (Repetition) ]
In this chapter I explained the importance of renetition in the
poetic text on the significant andformallevel. Repetition doesn’t
mean similarity which divided into 2 axes.
** [Tile first axis] :
Is individual repetition such as repetition of letter or noun or verb
and its Significance.
** [Tile Second Axis ]:
Repetition on the level of structure and I discussed the parallel of
construction.
** [Tile Last Chapter is (Tile construction of contradiction)] :
I made it at the end because it includes ail the previous
construction. I clarified the role of contradiction in producing the
Significance in the poetic text.
*;, There are three axes in it :
1. The First Axe: Man and age.
A. Also I explained Three images to this conflict sometimes
man can over come on the age or imagine he can do that.
B. The agreement and harmony between man and age and it ’s
uncontinuous agreement.
- yon’ -
3. Theforce of age on man and defeated him and man’s trial to
get rid of it.
II [ The second Axe J :
The relation of man (praised man) with the other. It may be a
relation of harmony or continuous conflict which the other
became defeated.
III The third Axe:
The entire construction which includes the contradiction and
what before itfrom construction and. I tried to make it through
the poetic texts, the entire construction includes 3 axes:
1. The completeness of praised man.
2. The completeness of beauty in woman.
3. The completeness of romance (poetry).