Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
مدى فاعلية العلاج الاسرى فى تحسين مفهوم الذات لدى الاطفال ذوى الاعاقه السمعيه /
الناشر
على عبد النبى محمد،
المؤلف
محمد، على عبد النبى
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / على عبد النبى محمد
مشرف / ساميه القطان
مناقش / امينه مختار
مناقش / ساميه القطان
الموضوع
الصحة النفسية.
تاريخ النشر
2000 .
عدد الصفحات
360ص. :
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
التعليم
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2000
مكان الإجازة
جامعة بنها - كلية التربية عام - صحة نفسية
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 375

from 375

المستخلص

Interest of children of special need generally, and of hearing
impairment specially, depends on the fact that the human being depends
essentially on his senses to deal with the environment around him.
Through these senses his feelings from his experiences, thus, the loss of
one of these senses, even partly, affects negatively on his personality, and
on the infonnation he has, it limits his experience World and deprives him
from some Sources from which the forms his personality.
There is no doubt that the hearing impaired child, his behavior, his
depriration from language make him different and strange from others,
this affects his self concept and leads him to isolation.
Through rounding on the studies that, deal with self concept of
hearing impaired children, it is proved that there is a negative singificant
relation between negative parental attitudes and self acceptance for those
children other studies assert that if the family system _ the parentsaccepts
the child’s impairment, and knows how to deal with him this
affects his self concept positively.
This can be explained from the special education point of view in
that the hearing impaired child exaggerates the family stress, and
becomes to be a start for a chain of psychological pains that may be
unbearable. The parents arc always Ioqkjog for a normal chikI who Is
considered be their extension in life, ad inwhom they see their futun:
project in which they invest their psychological Jove. It becomes to the a
trauma to givebiIth to an impaired <:biId.itIlpens the door to seIf~blame,
-------------------------------------/
-_. ~.-..
~ I
I
to trust destruction, to throw accusations and destray the family system
and its bach bone.
It’s not easy to study the child with hearing impairment away from
his family because it is the first source to take care of him, for this, the
hearing impaired child is in bad need for family therapy programs,
because the child’s SUccess or failure in social adjustment is not
associated with the child’s characteristics but also with his family, and
how it their to reach the maximum level of social adjustment.
Studies assert that the move the family gets use from the child’s
program, the move the program’s effectiveness are more sUccessful in the
impaired child. Counseling the parents is justified in that it is essential
and importan- t in the c- hild’s life, and the family should be the first
environment to face the child’s problems and his impainnent.
Consequently the family members participation m the child
programs play an important role in planning to his bringing up, and
building trust bridges and in creating a fueling of responsibility, and in
helping to understand his needs, and to CODHllumcatewith the child
effectively, and to them that the positive expectancies of parents affuct
positively the hearing impaired child’s say COncept,and his eValuation his
abilities, on the contrast, it is possible to get USeof this truth to amend our
expectancies towards the impaired, so he can correct his behavior.
Thus. it becomes obvious that lbe study to improve the hearing
impaired children self concept is very important.
The study problem :
The hearing impaired children have negative self concept about
them selves compared to their normal peers, and that the family system
members play an important role in that.
Thus the study problem is formed in that it tries to improve the
negative self concept for the hearing impaired children through using
family therapy, and to detennine its effectiveness in improving self
concept. The study problem isformed in this equation : what is the
effectiveness of family therapy in improving self concept for hearing
impairment children? Are there significant differences in the program
effect for the hard hearing and the deaf children? Can family therapy
effect extent to the follow up after applying the program.
The study Aim:
This study aims to test the possibility of improving self concept of
hearing impainnent children (the deaf. the hard hearing).
The study terms :
Family therapy :
It is the therapy that considers the family an integrated unit that
contains systems, disorders in the family to change these COmmunications
in and outside the family system to achieve family adjustment.
Self concept:
It’s a whole sight of one’s perception of himself: it is formed
through interaction between man and the environment with its
experiences towards his attitudes and his sides of personality, and how he
accepts them.
.......... --...-
Hearing imp,irment children:
- The deaf. : They are the children who lose hearing sense from
birth or before learning talk, so they can’t contact normally to
educational and social needs in hearing environment, except through
known communication media.
- The hard of hearing children : are those who suffer from partly
impainnent in hearing so they can not respond normally to educational
and social needs, except through using helping media.
The study tools :
1- Self concept scale.
2- An observation list of child behavior.
3- A self report (for parents) about the child.
4- Pictured intelligence test.
5- Family therapy program.
The study sample:
It contains (32) children from the deaf, the hard hearing children
aged from (9-12) YEARS.
They are divided to two groups (deaf group _ hard of
hearing group) :
- The deaf experimental group (8) children and their families.
- The deaf control group (8) children and their families.
- The hard of hearing experimental group (8) children and their
families.
- The hard of hearing control group (8) children and their families.
~---------------------~----------_..---,
-~
... ~. ~-\
,
The hypotheses :
1- There are significant statistically differences in the mean of degrees
the deaf experimental group degrees and the mean of the deaf control
group degree on the self concept scale after the program for the side of
the experimental group.
2- There are significant statistically differences in the mean of degrees
the hard of hearing experimental group and the mean of the hard
hearing control group degree on the self concept scale after the
program for the side of the experimental group.
3- There are significant statistically differences in the mean degrees of
the deaf experimental group and the deaf control group on the self
concept scale after the follow up for the side of the experimental
group.
4- There are significant statistically differences in the mean degrees of
the hard hearing experimental group and the hard hearing control
group on the self concept scale after the foHow up for the side of the
experimental group.
5- There are significant statistically differences in the mean of degrees
the deaf experimental group on the self concept scale in the after and
the foHow up application for the side of the after up.
6- There are significant statistically differences in the men of degrees of
the hard of hearing experimental group and the hard hearing control
group on the self concept scale in the after and the follow up
application for the side of after up.
7- There are significant differences in the mean degree of the deaf
experimental group and the hard of hearing experimental group on the
self concept scale after the ptogram for the side of the hard ofhearing.
8- There are significant differences in the mean degree of the deaf
experimental group and the hard of hearing experimental group on the
- -u-”.
self concept scale after the follow up for the side of the hard ofhearing
experimental.
- - ---:-=,”” i, ”
The statistical styles:
1- Variance analysis.
2- ”T” test.
The study boundaries:
The study and its results are bounded by its sample, tools, and the
statistical styles used in it.
The study results :
The results reveal that the first, the second, the third, the fourth, .
hypotheses are affirmed, but the fifth, the sixth the seventh and the eight
are not. The results are discussed in the light .of the theoretical
background and the previous.