الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Schizophrenia is a severe and persistent mental disorder that places significant burden on the individuals who suffer from it, as well as their families and society. The illness is defined by the presence of positive (i.e., hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thinking) and negative (i.e., poverty of speech, lack of motivation, flat affect) symptoms. Schizophrenia occurs throughout the world. The prevalence of schizophrenia (ie, the number of cases in a population at any one time point) approaches 1 percent internationally. The incidence (the number of new cases annually) is about 1.5 per 10,000 people. Slightly more men are diagnosed with schizophrenia than women (on the order of 1.4:1), and women tend to be diagnosed later in life than men. There is also some indication that the prognosis is worse in men. About 30 to 50% of people with schizophrenia fail to accept that they have an illness or their recommended treatment. While schizophrenia is noted for its psychotic symptoms and deficit features, cognitive impairments are important aspects of the illness as well. While these cognitive impairments are well known as predictors of different aspects of real-world functional outcomes, social disability inschizophrenia may have a number of additional determinants. One of the domains where in impairments may contribute to social disability in schizophrenia is social cognition. This is an area that is receiving an increase in attention that parallels the increased interest in cognition in schizophrenia over the past 10 years. Social cognition is defined as the ability to make inferences based on emotional information (emotion, perception or recognition), the ability to correctly identify and respond to social interactions and social rules or knowledge (social perception), and the ability to make inferences about another person’s thoughts, feelings, and intentions. Impairment in each of these domains has been shown to have a significant impact on functional outcome in clients diagnosed with schizophrenia and explains variance in functional outcome beyond that accounted for by elementary neurocognition. Social cognition can be understood through a conceptual model which involves four specific domains: theory of mind (ToM), attribution style (AS), emotion recognition (ER) and social perception (SP). Our study was a case control study; sample was divided into two groups: group A: 100 patients with schizophrenia. group B: 100 subjects of healthy volunteers.Patients were selected from Al-Ma’amoura outpatient clinics from the first of September of 2014 to the first of May 2015, fulfilling the criteria of schizophrenia according to ICD 10, aging between 25 & 50 years old, and both male and female genders were included. The aim of the current study was: 1. To assess social cognition functioning among a sample of outpatients presenting with schizophrenia. 2. To correlate between symptom profile & disease severity of schizophrenia and social cognition. In our study we used Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) to assess social cognition, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) to assess cognition and we used Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and to assess symptom severity of schizophrenia. Results of this study revealed that: Using MSCEIT results showed statistically significant difference between patients and healthy control in total score, experiential area and strategic area. Low total score in patients reflect decreased capacity to reason with emotion and to use emotion to enhance thought. Low experiential area score in patients reflect less identification of emotion and its productive use in thought.Low strategic area score in patients reflect impaired reasoning about emotions, how they develop over time, how they may be managed, and how to fit emotional management into social situations. Our results also showed significant difference between patients and healthy control only in two branches; facilitating branch and management branch of MSCEIT. Low facilitating branch score in patients reflect difficulty in generating emotions to compare and contrast with the sensory modalities. Low management branch score in patients reflects that patients are prone to misread a situation and blame out, blame others, feel a victim, feel others hurt them, get angry or withdraw, and want others to do something to make them feel better (low self-management). They may also not be able to identify/empathise with another’s emotions, but will react to another’s emotion with self-judgment (low social management). Using wisconsin card sorting test showed statistically significant difference between patients and healthy control in percent of conceptual level responses and categories completed. Percent of conceptual level responses and categories completed of WCST had low score that reflect impairment in concept formation in patients with schizophreniain the study sample.As regard correlation between PANSS scale total score and categories completed & perseverative errors subscales in WCST; they was statistically significant. There was also a statistically significant correlation between PANSS scale general psychopathology score and perseverative errors subscale in WCST. On the other hand, it was also detected that there was no statistically significant correlation between PANSS scale and MSCEIT scale. from the previous data we concluded that patients with schizophrenia have low self & social management and they also have lower capacity to use emotion to enhance thought than healthy people. Our results also conducted that patients with schizophrenia had impairment in concept formation. There was no correlation between emotional intelligence and symptoms of schizophrenia while performance of patients in WCST is affected by severity of symptoms of schizophrenia. |